🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to restrict social networking access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching intently to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a growing number of countries are moving toward parallel measures.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our youngsters' childhood". A law could be passed soon.
• Norway is set to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the recommendation systems".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the user details of social media participants. Officials have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "an measures on the table".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to enact a proposal increasing the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has suggested a related action, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised families to prevent their kids from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding statement supporting a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it highlights of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not create binding law.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," commented one parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the leadership has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "no option is discarded" but maintaining any policy must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, support gathered behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. However, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a teenager who died after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "cliff edge" of exposure when users become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the tech sector to design tools that are secure and age appropriate for children," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, action is largely happening at the regional government level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has passed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a regulation limiting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with additional time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise enacted measures demanding parental consent for teenagers to open social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some politicians to copy this example, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, additional states are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, world organizations strike a more nuanced tone. The UN children's agency has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even backfire". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

While this global conversation unfolds, the actions of Australia and several other countries indicate that governments internationally are no longer willing to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.